
Subcontracting must be considered as an industrial strategy

How to subcontract efficiently ?
Now this is an interesting case of Collective Intelligence! How can you develop Collective Intelligence between two legally distinct entities – especially without interfering – while managing to create optimal efficiency to achieve deliverables, respect timelines, and exercise everyone’s accountability?
This topic is often key, particularly in large companies who frequently act as the “ordering customer.” Unfortunately, subcontracting as a strategy is often neglected in favor of subcontracting in a piecemeal fashion, insufficiently integrated in a global industrial strategy (no deep or global reflection on “make or buy”). For example:
Too often, these insufficiencies lead to inefficiency, involuntary skill loss, and interference.
Subcontracting requires rigor if we hope to reach a good level of Collective Intelligence between the ordering customer and the third-party contractor. To that end, if we want to subcontract, there are a few points to focus on:
The question of subcontracting is fascinating because it is a real challenge for Collective Intelligence both prior to the action of subcontracting and during the execution of the outsourced activity. There is also one surprising aspect: contrary to what you might think at first glance, strict adherence for law encourages business efficiency!